EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/95.lightwave-10/000383_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Sat Oct 7 12:45:17 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-11-07 | 1KB

Received: by mail.webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA239165117; Sat, 7 Oct 1995 12:45:17 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from emout05.mail.aol.com by mail.webcom.com with ESMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA239105112; Sat, 7 Oct 1995 12:45:12 -0700
Received: by emout05.mail.aol.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id PAA13209 for [e-mail]; Sat, 7 Oct 1995 15:37:46 -0400
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 1995 15:37:46 -0400
From: [e-mail]
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Perception VS. Flyer ?
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

Has anyone seen a side by side comparison, or any comparison, of the picture
quality of the Flyer VS. the Perception.
Which is giving the best picture?  What are the differences ?  What
differences are you seeing in the compression methods ?  What quality
differences are there in the hardware approach that each of them has choosen
?
Is there a difference after each has gone down system and been dubbed 2 or
three times ?  And was it observed on BetaSP, 3/4" or S-VHS.
Thanks for your input.
Ed
CEVAnim
--
[e-mail] sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]